other:networking:opnsense:dmz
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| other:networking:opnsense:dmz [2023/09/27 07:43] – rodolico | other:networking:opnsense:dmz [2023/09/27 10:22] (current) – rodolico | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
| - Save | - Save | ||
| - Repeat for other server(s) | - Repeat for other server(s) | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Note:** Here we are forwarding ports to the same port on the internal target server. So, port 25 on the WAN targets port 25 on the mail server. This is NOT a requirement, | ||
| === NAT Reflection === | === NAT Reflection === | ||
| Line 125: | Line 127: | ||
| As of v23.7, the //Associate this with a regular firewall rule// does not appear to generate the correct rules. The rule shows up in the firewall, but does not work. | As of v23.7, the //Associate this with a regular firewall rule// does not appear to generate the correct rules. The rule shows up in the firewall, but does not work. | ||
| - | This has been reported a few times, and I'm assuming the excellent coders will fix it soon, but a work around is to choose //Pass// as the correct value for this. **Note:** You can change //Associate this with a regular firewall rule// to //Pass// with no problem, but once it is set to //Pass// you can not change back. | + | This has been reported a few times (see https:// |
other/networking/opnsense/dmz.1695818634.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/09/27 07:43 by rodolico
